“It's a fascinating indication that the extraterrestrial hypothesis apparently hasn't been ruled out,” he says. Bray said that, like everyone, he wanted immediate explanations but that “understanding can take significant time and effort.” This, he suggested, is why the Office of Naval Intelligence embarked on a “data driven, facts-based approach.”Īt one point in the hearing, Moultrie talked about being “open to all hypotheses.” Pope sees this as a positive sign. Both officials however stated they would not speculate on some of the more unusual sightings gathered by AOIMSG. The “other” bin could allow for foreign adversaries that have developed breakthrough technologies, but the other obvious implication is that it could also allow for extraterrestrials and extraterrestrial technology. government or industry developmental programs (secret aircraft), foreign adversary systems (drones), or an “other” bin that allows for “difficult cases and for the possibility of surprise and scientific discoveries.” That discouraged pilots and radar operators from speaking out, but a few brave ones did, and what happened on Tuesday is a testament to their courage and a vindication of their experiences.”īray explained during the hearing that UAP incidents likely resolve into five main categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, U.S. “Tuesday's hearing was a step forward,” Nick Pope, a former UFO investigator for the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence, tells Popular Mechanics, “For far too long, this subject was unfairly stigmatized, and witnesses were disbelieved or ridiculed. That agency, the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG), was tasked with, “scientific, operational, and technical analysis of data gathered by field investigations…to better understand and explain unidentified aerial phenomena.” The 2022 defense budget mandated that the Department of Defense create an agency to track UAP sightings.
Two Pentagon officials, Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence Scott Bray and Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security Ronald Moultrie, answered questions on the Pentagon’s recent UAP efforts. The reasoning is that if UAPs have a man-made origin, they could be intelligence operations against U.S. Questions included whether or not the government had crashed UFOs in its possession and whether or not the Pentagon was investigating reports of flying saucers interfering with nuclear weapons.Īlthough the C3 Subcommittee may seem like a strange host for a hearing on UFOs, the questions primarily focused on sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) on military training ranges, and whether they represented a safety or security threat to U.S. The hearing, held by the House Intelligence Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence and Counterproliferation, was the first on the subject of UFOs since 1968.
#Pope alien news full
Join our squad for full access to Pop Mech Pro. ✈ Don’t miss any of our best-in-class military and defense news. Members of Congress quizzed government officials tasked with investigating sightings of unidentified flying objects for more than an hour yesterday. The Pentagon officials did not entirely rule out an extraterrestrial origin for the sightings. The hearings addressed military sightings of UFOs in training areas and whether they posed a threat to pilots or national security.
Photo credit: Kevin Dietsch - Getty ImagesĬongress has held its first hearing on unidentified flying objects (UFOs) in more than 50 years.